User talk:Yair rand/Current Collaboration

Not to rain on your parade but it would seem that the suggested process is probably not a good idea.
 * 1) "Perfect is the enemy of good enough", users can quickly reach a satisfactory definition, but even two perfectionists are unlikely to ever reach an agreement on a perfect definition.
 * 2) The communication and coordination requirements increases exponentially with the number of participants.
 * 3) Wikimedia is not suited for merging concurrent edits.
 * 4) Wiktionary has rigidly requirement has well established standards. This allows people to contribute
 * 5) Based on word distribution statistic (Ziphs laws AKA long tail) almost all words require very short definitions.