Wiktionary:About Latin


 * See also Category:Latin language

(based on Entry layout)

Note 1: This guide is intended to provide guidelines both for creating Latin entries on English Wiktionary as well as for adding Latin translations to English words. The main guidelines for creating any entry on English Wiktionary is set forth in Entry layout; this page is an addition to that page, not a replacement.

Note 2: If a change occurs in the basic wiktionary template (currently at Entry layout) that affects Latin entries, then that change should be reflected here.

Latin script
Throughout history, Latin has been written in a variety of scripts and writing systems due to its influence across Europe. However, only entries in the Latin script are currently accepted in Wiktionary; words may be attested with quotes from other scripts, but the pagetitle itself must be in the Latin script.

Ligatures
Liguratures such as æ and œ only appear post-Classical Latin. When attested, these entries should use or  to point to the non-ligatured spelling.

I and J
The distinction between I and J only appears post-Classical Latin. When attested, entries for forms using the J should use or  to point to the non-J spelling.

Prefer V for consonantal form, but prefer U for the vowel form
In Latin, the letter written as V in ancient times represented either a vowel or a consonant depending on its position and the word. The vowel sound and the consonant sound had distinct pronunciations and different metrical treatment in poetry.

A modern typographical convention is to use the letter V only for the consonant sound, and only when it is the first sound in a syllable. The letter U is used for the vowel sound, and for the consonant sound in the combinations QU, GU and SU (as in quis, sanguis, and suadeo). Generally speaking, English textbooks and dictionaries always write U this way and the majority of reprints of classical texts adapt them and show U too. The use of V for the vowel in new works is usually a consciously classical style or appearance, and that includes for example inscriptions on new monuments and the like.

Since the vast majority of modern dictionaries, textbooks, and texts distinguish between U and V in printed forms, Wiktionary will adhere to the same distinction.


 * Example: The word eqvvs is usually presented in modern texts as equus – using a U to represent the vowel form of the Latin letter V. This is done to assist in pronunciation, and to conform to English expectations concerning the letters U and V.  Even though the spelling equus never occurred in Classical Latin, it is the preferred form for Wiktionary both because it is the form used in textbooks and Latin dictionaries and because it is the form typically used in Later Latin texts.

Distinguishing V and U allows us to keep separate terms that are pronounced differently but would be spelled the same if the distinction were not made, e.g. the bisyllabic word  vs. the trisyllabic word.

Do not use diacritical marks in page names
Most Latin dictionaries and textbooks use macrons (such as ā, ē, ī, ō, ū) in the headwords for entries. While these forms are traditional for reference works and useful to students, macrons do not appear in written Latin or in reproductions of literature and texts. Some older dictionaries and textbooks make use of breves (such as ă or ĭ), but these marks are not used in most textbooks nor in reproductions of literature. They appear in only a few modern dictionaries. Additionally, typing macrons or breves is difficult in many browsers and systems. Their use would make it difficult for users to search for words. For these reasons, the page name for Latin entries should not contain diacritical marks. However, macrons should be used within the body of pages. (see below)

Macrons should be used only within pages
It is conventional for printed Latin dictionaries to mark vowels that are pronounced long by placing a macron (a short horizontal bar, as in ā or ū) over such vowels in the headword.

Macrons were only used by the Romans in scanning exercises; in normal writing, vowel length was instead marked when necessary using the apex; in New Latin orthography, penultimate stressed (and thus long) vowels in words longer than two syllables were marked using the circumflex. With the development of the comparative method and the rising interest in the Reconstructed Pronunciation of Latin, the practice of using macrons was taken from dictionaries of poetic scansion such as the Gradus ad Parnassum, and since the beginning of the 20th century has become standard in textbooks.

On Wiktionary, macrons should never be used in the names of entries, so the word līber would appear on the page liber. However, within the text of the page, macrons should be used wherever appropriate. For example:

Adjective
In this example, the forms that would normally appear in the headers of a printed dictionary appear in the line immediately following the part of speech header. Notice that the (masculine) form matching the entry page is not linked, and so only needs to have the macron.
 * 1) free

Macrons should also be used on a page when linking to a Latin word entry from an Etymology, from a set of Translations, from Related terms, and from similar sections.

Breves should not be used at all
Some older dictionaries and textbooks make use of breves (such as ă or ĭ), but these marks are not used in most textbooks nor in reproductions of literature. They appear in only a few modern dictionaries. The purpose of including breves was to note the vowels whose pronunciation is short. However, if the long vowels are marked, it is unnecessary to mark the short ones since any unmarked vowel will be short. On Wiktionary, breves should not be used either in the names of pages for Latin words, nor in any of the text associated with Latin entries.

Note that Romanian, a language derived from Latin, does make use of breves, and for that language breves should be used as appropriate.

Ambiguous vowel length
A few entries display vowels with both a macron and a breve over the same character; this indicates that the length of the original vowel is unknown or that the vowel scans sometimes as long and sometimes as short in poetry.

Trema
The inclusion or exclusion of attested forms featuring trema, such as onomatopoeïa, is yet to be clarified. See e.g. Talk:onomatopoeïa for a discussion.

Circumflex
The inclusion or exclusion of attested forms featuring circumflex, such as duûm, is yet to be clarified. See e.g. Talk:duûm for a discussion.

Formatting Latin entries
For nouns, the lemma is usually the nominative singular; for adjectives, it is the masculine nominative singular; and for verbs, it is the first-person singular present active indicative (first principal part). The template identifies the lemma form and particular inflected form of the entry.

Non-lemma forms
When a non-lemma (inflected) form of a term coincides in spelling with the lemma form of the same term, even if it has additional macrons, the convention is to not include a separate non-lemma entry or distinct sense line.

Here is an example of what is not done:


 * water
 * aquā
 * aquā
 * aquā
 * aquā

This practice adds clutter to what are often already long entries, and readers can derive the information they need from the inflection table on that page. However, the pronunciation of the non-lemma form may be listed under the Pronunciation section: see for an example.

Definitions of verbs
Although Latin verbs are generally lemmatised in their first-person singular present indicative forms (like, literally 'I love') or for impersonals the third-person counterpart (like , literally 'it is suitable'), it has been agreed to gloss all of them with English infinitives (thus 'to love',  'to be suitable'). For handling Latin verbs in etymologies of other languages, see below.

Inflection
For Latin entries, this section should always use the Inflection header, and never the alternatives Declension or Conjugation. Doing so reduces the number of possible section names, and thus improves accessibility of Latin entries for learners of both Latin and English. It also sidesteps the problem created by participles, which are technically verbs but decline like adjectives.

For entries with irregular inflections, include a short sentence identifying specific irregularities.

Optionally, an introductory message may be included to identify the particular inflection pattern for nouns or adjectives. A list of these may be found at Wiktionary:Latin inflection templates. However, for most regular inflection patterns, this is not necessary. The information is already incorporated into the verb conjugation tables, and may eventually be incorporated into the declension tables as well.

The primary component of the Inflection section is a declension or conjugation table. Most regular patterns have templates, listed in Category:Latin verb inflection-table templates, Category:Latin noun inflection-table templates, Category:Latin adjective inflection-table templates, and others at Category:Latin inflection-table templates. Refer to a template's talk page for instructions and examples of use.

Quotations

 * Further guidance is given in the main article Quotations.

Quotations are an important part of Latin entries. They prove that the word was in existence at some point in time, point to the time periods during which a word sense was active, and hint at usage rules (e.g. does that verb take an accusative or a dative?)

Quotations should not be made up. We strive to document the Latin language, not add to it. Find a quotation that uses any sense and any inflection of the word, and reproduce it in the definition section at the appropriate word sense. Be sure to include a translation into English.

Good sources of quotations are:
 * Lewis and Short's A Latin Dictionary online at Perseus. Note that L&S tend to modify the inflection of the word from the actual quote, and do not include the full quote. Find the full quote in the stated source and use that.
 * Google Books. Restrict your searches by selecting Free Google eBooks and change the time period to end at 1500. If you find no suitable books, increase the ending period by 100 years until you reach 1900. After that, assume your search was unsuccessful, and try a different inflection.
 * Google Search. Sometimes this comes up with gems. Add "+site:vatican.va" to limit your search to the Vatican website.

Determine the original year of writing for the quote. For example, a book from 1750 reproducing the words of Vitruvius should not be quoted as being from 1750, but rather "prior to 15 ". Quotes from Virgil are particularly important to get right, since writers might pepper their works with quotes from Virgil ("as the Poet says..."). Find the original year of writing, attribute the quote to Virgil, find the name of Virgil's work that includes the quote, and whatever section information is necessary to find the quote. The exception, however, is works translated into Latin (for example, from Greek). In this case, indicate the original author, include "tr. by" and the translating author, and use the date of the translation, not of the original work.

If you can link the writer to a page on Wikipedia, do so using. If you can link the source to a page on la.wikisource.org, then do so using.

If you plan to use the same source over and over, consider writing a template following the pattern in. Existing templates for Latin sources can be found at Category:Latin quotation templates.

In the Latin quote, adhere to the following orthographic rules:
 * Do not use the ligatures æ or œ. Instead, use ae and oe.
 * Do not use the letter j. Instead, use the letter i.
 * Do not use mācrōns or brĕvĕs.
 * If the original quote uses an accent over a final letter a (whether mācron, ácute, ma&#x1DC4;cron-acute, dȯt, circûmflex, or any other mark) to indicate a feminine first declension ablative, use the acute accent: á. Authors often did this because the ablative would otherwise be ambiguous and possibly confused with the nominative (or with neuter plurals). This is an aid to interpretation, not an aid to pronunciation, which is why it does not conflict with the prohibition of macrons and breves.
 * If a word has ae or oe broken across syllables (as in, for example, or ), then put a diaeresis over the e: aër, poëta, regardless of whether the source does it. Again, this is done for disambiguation. For example,  (genitive of ) versus  (genitive of ).
 * Use the letter v for the consonant form, and the letter u for the vowel form.
 * Use the letter s when you encounter ſ (long s). Otherwiſe thine writing doth look effuſively old-faſhioned and unſuitable.
 * Do not "correct" words with nonstandard spellings. These are valuable and deserve to be treated as alternative forms.
 * Expand the & character to et.
 * Expand scribal abbreviation. For example, aute&#x1DC4; (e with macron-acute) becomes, &#xA759; (q with a diagonal stroke) becomes , and so on. While these are much more prevalent pre-Gutenberg, the macron-acute indicating a dropped -m or -n is often seen in post-Gutenberg works to save space.

Attestation
As a language with limited documentation, Latin entries may qualify for inclusion based merely upon a mentioning in certain sources. A mentioning in one or more of the following sources is sufficient for this minimal-attestation purpose: This list of acceptable sources may see expansion in the future.
 * 1) Paulus Diaconus’ epitome (8th C. ) of ’ epitome (late 2nd C. ) of Marcus Verrius Flaccus’ encyclopaedic dictionary, De verborum significatu (ante 20 ) — See.
 * 2) ’ De compendiosa doctrina (early 4th C. )
 * 3) Isidorus Hispalensis’  (circa 600–625 )

Latin verbs in etymologies of other languages
For borrowings into English of the type, the current practice seems to be to indicate derivation from the Latin past participle and then mention the lemma, as is done for instance in the etymology of. Note that is glossed as "to set free", per the aforementioned practice of "translate lemmas with lemmas".

For Romance languages that lemmatise verbs in the infinitive, the current practice is to link the Latin lemma form while displaying the Latin infinitive from which the Romance lemma derives. For instance, is etymologised as '', which links to the Latin lemma. This is done with the code.

Help from the community
Sometimes, we know there is a problem, but don't know what to do to correct the problem. If you should find a Latin entry with a problem that you do not know how to correct, there are several ways to approach the situation.


 * 1) Mark the page with .  This template will add the entry to Category:Requests for attention concerning Latin, where another user can then find and correct the problem.  It helps if you include comments on the entry's talk page explaining what the problem is or why you think the page needs attention.
 * 2) Raise the issue on Wiktionary talk:About Latin.  Note that this approach is primarily for issues of style, formatting, categorization, and not for specifics of content.
 * 3) Mark the page with .  this is a more general cleanup tag, and it allows the user to include reasons or concerns as an argument in the template.  Be sure to also add an entry to WT:RFC concerning the word so that other editors will be made aware of the problem.

Other Latin aids

 * Category:Latin language
 * Category:Latin templates
 * Latin templates
 * About Latin/Pronunciation
 * Requested entries (Latin)
 * Category:Latin entry maintenance