Wiktionary:CheckUsers/Archive

User:Kipmaster
I am hono(u)red to accept this nomination. (©Connel) Kipmaster 18:40, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Acceptance of nomination:


 * Support
 * 1) (82.18.21.208) SemperBlotto 18:43, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Enginear 19:38, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) --Connel MacKenzie 19:47, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) TheDaveRoss 19:51, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) —Stephen 21:27, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) --Versageek 04:16, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) Jon Harald Søby 13:06, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 8) \Mike 14:33, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 9) — Vildricianus 10:00, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 10) Jonathan Webley 09:21, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 11) Rod (A. Smith) 00:00, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 12) --birdy (:> )= 20:07, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 13) --Tosca 20:16, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 14) GerardM 05:55, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 15) Pill  δ  21:04, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 16) Dvortygirl 03:15, 11 September 2006 (UTC) Gladly!
 * 17) Robert Ullmann 15:54, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 18) bd2412 T 17:12, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 19) EncycloPetey 22:10, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 20) --Thogo (talk) 19:01, 14 September 2006 (UTC) Oui.
 * 21) -- Rory  096 06:34, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 22) Moyogo 12:54, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 23) Paul G 17:35, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 24) Dakdada 17:04, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 25) &mdash;Celestianpower háblame 21:54, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 26) Alhen 18:49, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 27) Jeffqyzt 15:57, 2 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Oppose


 * Comments

User:Connel MacKenzie

 * Acceptance of nomination:

I am honored to accept this nomination. --Connel MacKenzie 16:44, 31 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Support
 * 1) (82.18.21.208) SemperBlotto 18:43, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Kipmaster 19:09, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Enginear 19:38, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) TheDaveRoss 19:50, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) —Stephen 21:27, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) --Versageek 04:16, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) Jon Harald Søby 13:06, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 8) \Mike 14:33, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 9) — Vildricianus 10:00, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 10) Jonathan Webley 09:20, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 11) Rod (A. Smith) 00:00, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 12) --birdy (:> )= 20:07, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 13) --Tosca 20:16, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 14) GerardM 05:55, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 15) Pill  δ  21:04, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 16) Dvortygirl 03:15, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 17) Robert Ullmann 15:55, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 18) bd2412 T 17:12, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 19) Taxman 17:53, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 20) EncycloPetey 22:10, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 21) --Thogo (talk) 19:01, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 22) -- Rory  096 06:31, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 23) --Dijan 06:38, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 24) Paul G 17:35, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 25) Dakdada 17:04, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 26) &mdash;Celestianpower háblame 21:55, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 27) Alhen 18:49, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 28) Jeffqyzt 15:57, 2 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Oppose


 * Comments

User:Jon Harald Søby

 * Acceptance of nomination: I am honoured to accept this nomination. (Shameless ripoff of Kip/Connel.) Jon Harald Søby 13:02, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Support
 * 1) Kipmaster 14:11, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) \Mike 14:33, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) --Versageek 14:52, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) --Connel MacKenzie 17:06, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) Enginear 09:45, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) —Stephen 15:57, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) — Vildricianus 10:00, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 8) Jonathan Webley 09:20, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 9) Rod (A. Smith) 00:00, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 10) --birdy (:> )= 20:07, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 11) --Tosca 20:16, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 12) GerardM 05:55, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 13) Pill  δ  21:05, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 14) Dvortygirl 03:15, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 15) Taxman 17:53, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 16) --Thogo (talk) 19:01, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 17) TheDaveRoss 06:08, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 18) -- Rory 096 06:32, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 19) --Dijan 06:38, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 20) SemperBlotto 07:41, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 21) EncycloPetey 15:23, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 22) Moyogo 12:55, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 23) Paul G 17:35, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 24) Dakdada 17:05, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 25) bd2412 T 17:58, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 26) &mdash;Celestianpower háblame 21:57, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 27) Alhen 18:50, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 28) Robert Ullmann 13:53, 27 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Oppose


 * Comments
 * 1) Clarification: Jon is of course already a steward and so has access to the CheckUser privileges on all wikis. This appointment, however, would make that he no longer needs to change his status back and forth all the time. — Vildricianus 10:00, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

User:Tim Q. Wells

 * I have been a contributor since late 2005 but have been registered for about two months and now have over 2,000 edits. Also I have had much experience with Wikipedia and some with Wikispecies. I would like to help as a backup when no one with Check User is available. I plan on being careful about the privacy of users. Tim Q. Wells 05:04, 19 April 2007 UTC

Decision

 * Withdrawn

User:Uncle G

 * Acceptance of nomination: As I said on Wikibooks when this same idea came up at the start of 2006, if you hand CheckUser privileges to me I plan to be very strict about user privacy.  I'm happy to act as a backup for the other editors with CheckUser privileges if you think that one is needed.  However, I'm also happy if you decide on the basis of the other discussions here that you have enough editors with CheckUser privileges already. Uncle G 16:11, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Support
 * 1) --Connel MacKenzie 17:05, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Kipmaster 22:53, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Enginear 09:44, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) —Stephen 15:56, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) \Mike 10:40, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) Jon Harald Søby 15:02, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) Jonathan Webley 09:24, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 8) Rod (A. Smith) 00:00, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 9) GerardM 05:55, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 10) TheDaveRoss 15:24, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 11) --Versageek 06:13, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 12) SemperBlotto 07:40, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 13) Paul G 17:35, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Obvious nepotism, voting for your uncle like that! ;-) bd2412 T 17:52, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) bd2412 T 17:51, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) --Thogo (talk) 12:00, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Dakdada 17:04, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) &mdash;Celestianpower háblame 21:57, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) Robert Ullmann 13:52, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) MGSpiller 22:29, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) Jeffqyzt 15:57, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 8) Of course (just in case this gets to 25 before the next ice age). Dmcdevit·t 03:37, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) ArielGlenn 03:41, 30 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Oppose


 * Comments

Decision

 * As this has not yet reached 25 votes after more than a year, I think it is time to archive. The candidacy should be raised again if desired. -  16:39, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Kelly Martin

 * Acceptance of nomination:
 * To the extent that this is a discussion as to whether my current "guest" status should be made indefinite, I accept. If the community elect not to support me, I will request my guest status revoked as soon as two native checkusers have been confirmed and promoted. Kelly Martin 18:47, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Support
 * 1) Since she has already been trusted with the tool so far. Kipmaster 19:09, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) --Connel MacKenzie 19:15, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Enginear 19:39, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) —Stephen 21:28, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) --Versageek 04:16, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) Jon Harald Søby 13:06, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) — Vildricianus 10:00, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 8) TheDaveRoss 01:34, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 9) Rod (A. Smith) 00:00, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 10) --Tosca 20:16, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 11) GerardM 05:55, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 12) Dvortygirl 03:15, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 13) Taxman 17:53, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 14) --Thogo (talk) 19:01, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 15) --Dijan 06:38, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 16) SemperBlotto 07:42, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 17) Paul G 17:35, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 18) Per Connel's comment below. <i style="background:lightgreen">bd2412</i> T 17:59, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 19) Robert Ullmann 13:55, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 20) \Mike 15:23, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 21) MGSpiller 22:33, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 22) Jeffqyzt 15:57, 2 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Oppose
 * 1) Nothing personal, but we now have enough native CheckUsers to make her redundant, in my opinion. Thanks for doing it while we didn't though - it's much appreciated. &mdash;Celestianpower háblame 10:07, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) * I do not understand the objection. With over 40+ admins, we still occasionally fall short of needed coverage.  CheckUsers are similar, but slightly less urgent.  If I reach 25 votes, and no others do, I will not be granted the checkuser flag (as there would be no one to verify that I do not abuse the privilege, therefore meta: would not grant me the ability.)  Kelly Martin has been doing an excellent job of clearing the CheckUser requests we have had so far.  Her ability to check the Wikipedia CU logs adds tremendous value and insight on borderline results.  --Connel MacKenzie 19:14, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) ** That's the point, in my mind: "slightly less urgent". We can always wait for a native Wiktionarian CheckUser to do the job (or pester a steward, if it needs to be done quickly). Hence, I don't believe we need a Wikipedian to do this role. Again, I have nothing against Kelly in particular. Regards, &mdash;Celestianpower háblame 22:44, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) *** That's 'Wikimedian', if you please. Kelly Martin 12:13, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree with Connell that "Her ability to check the Wikipedia CU logs adds tremendous value and insight on borderline results." --Eng in ear 08:29, 26 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Comments

Decisions

 * As this has not yet reached 25 votes after more than a year, I think it is time to archive. The candidacy should be raised again if desired. -  16:39, 2 March 2008 (UTC)