Wiktionary:Requests for verification archive/2011


 * See also Requests for verification archive/2011/more. Some terms which had notes on their talk pages linking here have since been moved to there.

= March 2011 =

Victoria&
WT:CFI says this needs to be attested with a meaning other than the company name. That's more or less impossible. --Mglovesfun (talk) 12:54, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * This is for RFD. I would even vote delete, as this company name cannot carry any information that is of lexicographical interest. The section WT:CFI#Company names is an invention of DAVilla. Curiously enough, "Victoria's Secret" entry was created on 16 April 2007 by DAVilla. But I see that the company name just passed RFD on 10 February 2011. --Dan Polansky 08:32, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
 * "...as this company name cannot carry any information that is of lexicographical interest." I suspect that twelve years ago the same would have been easily said about Enron.  I agree that at the moment it does not carry any information which is significant to us here, but who knows what the future may bring! -  10:38, 27 June 2011 (UTC)


 * When an entry with citations is deleted, why aren't the citations moved to the Citations page?
 * Why was this put in RfV when it had been cited for RfD? DCDuring TALK 14:05, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Meh, I've removed the tag. Feel free to delete it if you believe the citations in the entry do not meet CFI; otherwise, by default, this stays. - -sche (discuss) 05:29, 1 February 2012 (UTC)