Wiktionary:Votes/2007-08/Formatting of mentioned terms

Formatting of mentioned terms

 * Straw-polling on: how to format mentioned terms in English or an English-like alphabet. (Note that this is not about transliterations, and does not apply to terms in languages like Russian, Hebrew, or Chinese; those have their own considerations.)
 * Straw-poll ends: 5 September 2007 23:59 UTC
 * Straw-poll started: 27 August 2007 23:59 UTC
 * Straw-poll created: —Ruakh TALK 21:16, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Discussion:
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] WT:BP

In "form of" templates, etc.
This section is included only for completeness; this has been resolved by Votes/2006-12/form-of style. The conclusion was to use bold by default (but this is overrideable by user CSS).

Elsewhere in definition lines
Please enter,  ,  ,  , or the like on the next blank line to indicate your preference for how mentioned terms in definition lines (aside from mentioned terms in "form of" templates) should be formatted.

In usage notes
Please enter,  ,  ,  , or the like on the next blank line to indicate your preference for how mentioned terms in usage notes should be formatted.

In etymologies
Please enter,  ,  ,  , or the like on the next blank line to indicate your preference for how mentioned terms in etymologies should be formatted.

In "* terms", "*onyms", and similar sections
Please enter,  ,  ,  , or the like on the next blank line to indicate your preference for how mentioned terms should be formatted in "Related terms", "Derived terms", "Synonyms", "Antonyms", "Descendants", etc.

Comments

 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Wiktionary talk:Votes/2007-08/Formatting of mentioned terms

Conclusion

 * Withdrawn in favor of Votes/2007-08/style for mentioned terms.