Wiktionary:Votes/2020-07/Adding topa to all Proto-Slavic descendants sections

Adding topa to all Proto-Slavic descendants sections
Voting on: Adding, either manually or by automatic means, the template or some other columnising template to the descendants section of all Proto-Slavic entries.

A prior vote was inconclusive on whether column templates were desirable in descendants. This vote codifies whether Proto-Slavic entries should, as a matter of agreement, always have their descendants divided into columns for every user, including unregistered users. If the vote fails, this leaves the current default situation in place, which is that the appearance of each individual entry is left to the discretion of any editor editing the page.

The vote is set up in such a way that there are three levels of support, with stronger levels also counting towards weaker. The strongest level of support that passes the 2/3 majority (as agreed by a previous vote) will be enacted.

Schedule:
 * Vote starts: 00:00, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Vote ends: 23:59, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Vote created: —Rua (mew) 11:28, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Discussion:
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Votes/2020-01/Deprecating topN
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Beer parlour/2019/June
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Wiktionary talk:Votes/2020-07/Adding topa to all Proto-Slavic descendants sections

Support, no columns by default, opt-in through a gadget

 * 1)  —Rua (mew) 07:57, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
 * 2)  Gnosandes (talk) 11:11, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Support, with columns by default, opt-out through a gadget
(Votes for this option also count for the previous one)


 * 1)  — Vorziblix (talk · contribs) 21:00, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Support unconditionally
(Votes for this option also count for the previous two)


 * 1) Support: --  04:36, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) . Poorly structured vote on a topic that probably shouldn't be voted on in the first place. This is what discussions are for. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 04:24, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
 * 2)  Guitarmankev1 (talk) 13:38, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Abstain

 * 1)  Poll definition is inconsistent and ambiguous, it was pointed out in the discussion page. —Игорь Тълкачь (talk) 12:09, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
 * : Any vote that doesn't have an option for a status quo is an illegitimate vote and I will not recognize its outcome. -- 04:17, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
 * : Per Metaknowledge, except I think either way is okay. —AryamanA (मुझसे बात करें • योगदान) 21:16, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Decision
This is clearly a failed vote, and obviously the community is extremely uninterested in the matter. --Java Beauty (talk) 21:54, 6 September 2020 (UTC)