Wiktionary:Votes/2022-05/sin flattening validation

sin flattening validation
Voting on: Do we accept the citations for sin flattening as providing sufficient validation for this term as a hotword?

Schedule:
 * Vote starts: 00:00, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Vote ends: 23:59, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Vote created: Kiwima (talk) 02:27, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Support

 * 1)  I support the support for sin flattening. These are fairly well-established blogs, for the most part. Kiwima (talk) 02:48, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * 2)  Binarystep (talk) 03:20, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
 * 3)  Overlordnat1 (talk) 13:39, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1)  —  [ זכריה קהת ] Zack. — 04:52, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 2)  cheugy is an example of a former hot word (only passed the year-mark a month back) that is so spicy hot it has twenty-five cites, without lifting a finger. I don't get into hot words very often, but I would not use the proposed basis as the rationale for keeping this entry. --Geographyinitiative (talk) 18:15, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 3) . Only the third quote is an actual use; the other quotes have the word followed by its definition. Apart from that I agree with the abstainers that votes are not the way to hold these discussions. MuDavid 栘𩿠 (talk) 08:30, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Abstain

 * 1)  Another unnecessary vote that is destroying the established procedures of RfV. - Sarilho1 (talk) 09:10, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
 * 2)  This discussion should take place at RFV. Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty ⚧️ Averted crashes 22:58, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 3)  This issue is not what votes are for. —Mahāgaja · talk 19:45, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Decision
No consensus 3-3-3 (50%). This, that and the other (talk) 01:54, 12 June 2022 (UTC)