Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2008-09/User:SwimBot for bot status

User:SwimBot for bot status

 * Nomination: I hereby request the Bot flag for User:SwimBot for the following purposes:
 * Add conjugated forms of Spanish verbs. Although there is another bot proposal for the same thing, I feel my bot could still be useful since it will focus on regularly conjugated verbs.
 * Example entries: soplar, impeler
 * Bot code: None, uses Microsoft Excel to generate text files and the Python Wikipedia framework to import the articles.
 * Vote ends: 30 September 2008 23:59 UTC
 * Vote started: 00:35, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

I'd like to end this vote- too many issues and it's obvious I'm in over my head. 1 bot to add forms is enough. Nadando 01:32, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Discussion:
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] User talk:SwimBot

Support

 * 1) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Matthias Buchmeier 10:01, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Conrad.Irwin 17:53, 29 September 2008 (UTC) We should really think of a better way of doing these than having everyone writing their own solutions to this problem though.

Oppose

 * 1) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose —Stephen 00:50, 23 September 2008 (UTC) I think it is a mistake to call soplado, soplando or other participles verbs. Participles are made from verbs, but they are adjectives, adverbs, and sometimes nouns. It is best to call them participles. I have never heard of them being called verbs.
 * Ah, I see what you mean now. It would just be making more work for other people if I were to create them now. Until there is an agreed upon format for Spanish participles, I will not create them. Nadando 01:14, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose EncycloPetey 17:59, 29 September 2008 (UTC) For two reasons: (1) You have not staisfactorily explaned the bot functioning as required by WT:BOT, and (2) some pages like impela: have inconsistent formatting.  Both of these problems are solveable. --EncycloPetey 17:59, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Decision

 * Failed, 2:2 and creator request that vote be closed. --Neskaya kanetsv 18:37, 5 October 2008 (UTC)