Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2016-08/User:OctraBot for bot status

User:OctraBot for bot status

 * Nomination: I hereby request the Bot flag for User:OctraBot for the following purposes:
 * Interwiki cleanup using pywikibot. It has been run on many Wiktionaries for some time.
 * Content cleanup implementing Wiki.java. This task is generic purpose; it will be manually run in required situation such as template replacement, format cleanup. It has ever been run on Thai Wikipedia, Thai Wiktionary and few other projects. Some tasks in this scope may need to vote in the future.
 * Octahedron80 (talk) 00:44, 27 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Vote starts: 00:44, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Vote ends: 23:59, 9 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Discussion:
 * User talk:Octahedron80

Support

 * 1)  --Daniel Carrero (talk) 05:46, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I said Octahedron80 could use OctraBot to do a very small test run if the owner wanted. Apparently the test run is going well. Hence support. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 05:46, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * The bot was blocked a few days ago because the owner did 60+ test edits before the bot was approved. The number of edits may be a little high, but the edits seem otherwise OK with me. In my opinion, the bot can be unblocked without prejudice if this vote passes. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 09:56, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
 * WT:BOT says to do "10-50" test edits, so 60+ does not sound too excessive. --WikiTiki89 11:43, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
 * 1)  -Xbony2 (talk) 20:39, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * 2)  Wyang (talk) 10:48, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
 * 3)  --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 12:49, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
 * 4)  —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 14:34, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Abstain

 * 1)  Andrew Sheedy (talk) 22:56, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Decision
Passed. 5-1-0 (100%-0%) --Daniel Carrero (talk) 00:05, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I unblocked the bot without prejudice.
 * , someone please flip the bit for.
 * , the bot user page is empty. It would be nice if it had a short description of the bot work. Thank you. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 00:05, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Actually, I made a mistake and closed the vote early. (It was scheduled to end today at 23:59) But the vote would pass equally well tomorrow, so I won't bother to undo my edit. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 00:18, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Done. —Stephen (Talk) 01:40, 9 September 2016 (UTC)