Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2018-01/User:PavliukBot for bot status

User:Pavliukdanila for bot status
Nomination: I hereby request the Bot flag for User:PavliukBot for the following purposes: Good day! I run all wiktionaries your bot for routine work: greeting new participants who have reached a certain number of edits, work with directories, edit wikisyntax, and also automatic creation of archives. Examples of the work of my bot you can see in the Russian Wiktionary. In addition to the current features, I also plan to develop and improve. The bot is written in PyWIkiBot framework, in Python. In addition, the bot will also execute orders to the bot, for example to correct a lot of typos in categories, and so on. ..

Schedule:
 * Vote starts: 02:57, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Vote ends: 23:59, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Vote created: Pavliukdanila (talk) 02:57, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Discussion:
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Beer parlour/year/month
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] User talk:Pavliukdanila
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Wiktionary talk:Votes/bt-2018-01/User:Pavliukdanila

Oppose

 * 1) . Premature vote. You have not started any discussion on this Wiktionary about what exactly your bot might do, or ascertained whether we even want it. Nor have you presented any test bot edits here (I tried the link to your bot's contribs on ru.wikt, and the recent edits were all find-and-replace that we don't need you to do. As a non-member of the en.wikt community, you need to demonstrate that you are going to run your bot according to local wishes, and you have not done that. If I were you, I would postpone this vote, start a discussion at the Beer parlour where you ask about what people think of your exact plans here, and then get to this step. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 14:44, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I can't fulfill all your great wishes. If you want a bot that will do what you want - take and create, no one bothers you. In addition to renaming, if you were a little closer, he sends the participants a template-greeting. And what I have you the details to provide? Let's keep the verge of decency, and to act according to the consensus. If you would prefer, you will fulfill the desire of community and routine work requests. --Pavliukdanila (talk) 15:04, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Another question, since when you started to Express the opinion of the community? "We want, we don't want", something I have not seen such a consensus, which would give you the right for the community to speak. --Pavliukdanila (talk) 15:07, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Your attitude is very poor and your response somewhat difficult to understand. Your appeal to "consensus" is most displeasing, considering how you are using that as justification for not engaging in discussion with the community in order to build a consensus! —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 15:09, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
 * So maybe you should before applying, indicate somewhere that we need to discuss this? Now it's too late. If I had known, I certainly would have done it, but what I have not seen information block this information. --Pavliukdanila (talk) 15:11, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Voting policy: "Once a discussion has reached a point where a vote is in order, a new voting page should be created". Equinox ◑ 15:12, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Then please delete the application on the request of the author


 * 1)  No other edits. Poor grasp of the English language. SemperBlotto (talk) 15:08, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
 * 2) . Users can't just pop up out of the blue and expect to run a bot. DonnanZ (talk) 17:05, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Decision
Withdrawn at the request of the vote's creator. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 02:42, 7 January 2018 (UTC)