Wiktionary:Votes/cu-2014-11/User:Liliana-60 for checkuser

User:Liliana-60 for checkuser

 * Nomination: I hereby nominate User:Liliana-60 as a local English Wiktionary CheckUser. I believe the user has the necessary experience as a sysop to be an effective CheckUser.  I also believe more CheckUsers are needed, as the current three are inactive for extended periods.  Pur ple back pack 89   23:38, 5 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Vote started: 00:00 7 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Vote ends: 23:59 6 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Acceptance: Yeah, sure. Given that our current checkusers are all inactive, we desperately need one to deal with the open requests on WT:CU. -- Liliana • 23:41, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Support

 * 1)  as nom Pur ple back pack 89   23:38, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 2) . We need more CheckUsers, and Liliana seems like a fairly logical choice, and a sound, responsible sysop who has dealt well with things in the past. (And I certainly don't want the job (and am not active enough for it anyway).) --Neskaya sprecan? 00:58, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 3)  —Stephen (Talk) 02:12, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 4)  --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 05:50, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Oppose. Edits like Special:Diff/24561442 make me doubt this user would use the tool responsibly. — Keφr 06:17, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose, one who handles potentially private information should not be engaging in long-standing feuds with other major editors. Wyang (talk) 06:42, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose. Bullying, hostility, irrelevant political references. I am worried if a person with such attitudes to other editors becomes a CheckUser. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 23:49, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 4) Liliana has done a lot of good work for this project, but I have to oppose making  a checkuser, for the reasons Wyang gave. - -sche (discuss) 21:40, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 5)  per the comment that Keφr dug up (which I was thinking of as soon as I saw this vote, anyway). —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:35, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Decision
Fails 4–5–0. — Keφr 18:25, 7 December 2014 (UTC)