Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2010-02/Correct figures in CFI

Correct figures in CFI

 * Voting on: Making the following changes in Criteria_for_inclusion in the sentence reading:

''At present another 13 of the 2600 languages in the ISO 639-3 list are constructed languages. Words in 10 of those languages have not yet been approved for inclusion in the English Wiktionary.''


 * Change the figure 2600 to 7000. An IP originally added this figure, and it is unknown where it comes from. By current count, the ISO 639-3 standard contains about 7,500 languages (which can be verified by downloading the ISO 639-3 SQL dump), so this figure should be changed.


 * Change the figure 13 to 12 and the following figure 10 to 9. Since this paragraph lists only nine languages and the next paragraph contains three (for a total of twelve languages), the count should be updated to reflect that fact.


 * Vote starts: 00:00, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Vote ends: 24:00, 28 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Vote created: Prince Kassad 21:17, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Discussion:

Support

 * 1) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Yair rand 00:12, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support. Also, for this kind of non-policy change that's highly unlikely to be controversial, I think it's fine to set the vote to last just a week. (SFAIK, we don't have any policies on how long a vote has to be run for.) —Ruakh TALK 03:12, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Bequw → τ 05:01, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Well, It's only logical to do so isn't it? 50 Xylophone Players talk 14:50, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * 5) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support I don't understand why such trivial changes should be voted at all. Not that Wiktionary concept of language is identical to ISO 639-3 but anyways. --Ivan Štambuk 14:51, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Re: voting at all: I agree, but see Votes/pl-2009-03/Removing vote requirements for policy changes. Your nemesis had a hand in that. ;-)  —Ruakh TALK 16:06, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support. On whether to have a vote: It seems good that we have CFI tightly under control; a vote for a highly uncontroversial change can be made last only one week. --Dan Polansky 17:21, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Equinox ◑ 17:22, 15 February 2010 (UTC) Ha. Equinox ◑ 17:22, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Decision

 * Passes 7-0-0. --Yair rand 00:31, 1 March 2010 (UTC)