Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2012-02/Brand names and physical product 2

Brand names and physical product 2

 * Voting on: Modifying the "Brand names" section of Criteria for inclusion from this:

to this:

This removes the "for a physical product" part and modifies the following text accordingly, thus making any brand name subject to these criteria. The results of the vote Votes/pl-2012-02/Brand names and physical product, which is a subset of this vote, will be overridden should both votes pass.


 * Vote starts: 00:01, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Vote ends: 23.59, 7 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Vote created: Liliana • 17:01, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Discussion:
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] WT:BP
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] RFV
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] RFV
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Talk:vi
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2012-02/Brand names and physical product
 * [[Image:Wikt rei-artur3.svg|20px]] Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2012-02/Brand names and physical product 2

Support

 * 1) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Liliana • 17:50, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Equinox ◑ 18:05, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support - -sche (discuss) 21:04, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support --Anatoli (обсудить) 23:52, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support. As I wrote at this vote's sister: I'm not a huge fan of the brand-names criteria in general, but if we're going to have them, we might as well have them for all types of brands. —Ruakh TALK 15:09, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support BiblbroX дискашн 17:16, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support. &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 18:32, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support -- Cirt (talk) 07:24, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support --Daniel 11:45, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
 * 10) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support &mdash;Internoob 23:40, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
 * 11) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support. Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV 11:15, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
 * 12) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support. Could almost have been this way from the beginning. DAVilla 04:06, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose  Dan Polansky (talk) 17:57, 22 March 2012 (UTC) I am hesitant to oppose, but I do oppose, after all. The good thing about the proposed change is that it removes the separation of brand names of products from brand names of services. The bad thing is that it extends an over-exclusive regulation to brand names of services. See also my vote at Votes/pl-2012-02/Brand names and physical product. --Dan Polansky (talk) 17:57, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Abstain

 * 1) [[Image:Symbol abstain vote.svg|20px]] Abstain. I'm leaning towards support because I think it will be easier to implement than what it's replacing, but I'm ambivalent enough about the issue to abstain rather than support. Mglovesfun (talk) 18:02, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Abstain  Why is this being changed? There's not a single example mentioned here of a discussion or situation where this would make a difference. How will this change our practices? —Michael Z. 2012-03-20 02:14 z 
 * As regards entries impacted by the change: Amtrak was argued by some (Talk:Amtrak) to be a name of service, to be regulated by WT:BRAND. --Dan Polansky (talk)
 * 1) Abstain. (I feel like we're probably going to regret this change at some point, but I can't think of any specific reasons...) --Yair rand (talk) 12:54, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Decision
12-1-3 - Passes. --Daniel 18:10, 9 April 2012 (UTC)