Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2009-11/User:Yair rand for admin

Yair rand for admin

 * Nomination: I hereby nominate Yair rand as a local English Wiktionary Administrator. He does great entry work, as well as great vandal-fighting work, and he would use the tools to their fullest potential.  I believe that he has the correct temperment to become an administrator, and overall, I think he would be a great administrator.  Razorflame 07:24, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Vote starts: 08:04, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Vote ends: 24:00, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Acceptance: I accept, but I still intend to use the delete template except where I am absolutely certain, as I have made multiple mistakes regarding whether an entry should be deleted before.
 * Languages: en, eo-1, he-1
 * Timezone: UTC-5
 * Yair rand 07:36, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support L&#9786;g&#9786;maniac chat? 16:43, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support. &mdash;AugPi 16:44, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support he's not sysop already? -- Prince Kassad 16:45, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support. &#x200b;— msh210 ℠ 17:06, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
 * 5) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Conrad.Irwin 17:34, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
 * 6) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Ultimateria 22:39, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
 * 7) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support cautiously. He'll be our third admin-Jew after msh210 and Ruakh. I suspect they are conspiring to take over Wiktionary. --Vahagn Petrosyan 22:29, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
 * 8) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support EncycloPetey 22:31, 22 November 2009 (UTC) Like Davilla, I have some concerns about the length of time spent editing here, but I'm more inclined to support based on the work I've seen. --EncycloPetey 22:31, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
 * 9) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Volants 14:12, 24 November 2009 (UTC) all good work
 * 10) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support LOL @ Vahagn. Where does it say he's Jewish anyway? XD 50 Xylophone Players talk 14:36, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Vahagn probably either figured it out from my name or looked at my wp page. :) --Yair rand 17:35, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Ivan Štambuk 18:18, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Weak support Equinox ◑ 18:20, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support as nominator. Razor<b style="color:#696969">fl</b><b style="color:#808080">ame</b> 18:52, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] Support Rising Sun 20:48, 2 December 2009 (UTC) I hope I voted in time

Oppose

 * 1) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose. Certainly this is nothing personal, but this user is still a bit too new to the WM community. DAVilla 06:38, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose, per DAVilla and that I honestly just haven't seen this user around enough for to be able to support him as an admin yet.  However, in due time, maybe.  --Neskaya contribs–talk? 20:57, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose - Amgine/talk 18:28, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Oppose. Far too pushy, too disorganised, too many unilateral decisions, too much acting without consensus or real support, in the Vote for a new Wiktionary logo.--Richardb 10:09, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Abstain

 * 1) [[Image:Symbol abstain vote.svg|20px]] Abstain — <font face="Lucida console">[&#32;R·I·C&#32;] opiaterein — 17:03, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) [[Image:Symbol abstain vote.svg|20px]] Abstain The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 18:17, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) [[Image:Symbol abstain vote.svg|20px]] Abstain too few edits but since I don't know him well, I don't want to vote against either. Mglovesfun (talk) 18:21, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Decision
Comment The last 3 supports and last 2 abstains are invalid due to closing time are they not? 50 Xylophone Players talk 19:49, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Why? To-day is 2 December, the vote ends in 24:00 and there are 4 more hours left. It is not 00:00 and I thought this is the difference between those two designations, is it not? The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 19:53, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * There is no 24:00 is there? If it means 00:00 then yes, that was several hours ago. Mglovesfun (talk) 19:55, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * 24:00 can only logically be concluded to be the minute after 23:59 which is unambiguously at the end of today (though I would encourage the use of 23:59 instead) Conrad.Irwin 20:12, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Passes 14–4–3 (77¾%). &#x200b;— msh210 ℠ 17:15, 3 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Made it so. SemperBlotto 17:23, 3 December 2009 (UTC)