Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2018-01/User:Koavf for admin

User:Koavf for admin
Nomination: I hereby nominate as a local English Wiktionary Administrator. Friendly, polite and experienced contributor; I believe he'll put the admin tools to good use.

See User_talk:Koavf for previous discussion.

Schedule:
 * Vote starts: 10:59, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Vote ends: 23:59, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Vote created: Rerum scriptor (talk) 10:59, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Acceptance:
 * Languages: en-N, es-2, de-1, pt-1 (and 1 on other Romance languages)
 * Timezone: UTC+ 4
 * Thanks to Rerum for the nomination. who commented on my talk regarding this. Also  who may have opinions on this topic pro- or con- and  since they voted on me before for another issue. I would encourage everyone to take a look at this unsuccessful CheckUser vote and the recent discussion of de-sysopping 19 admins for context, and this cross-activity tool or Special:CentralAuth/Koavf to get an idea of what I do around the WMF projects and how I've used advanced user rights elsewhere; I've been on this project since 2005 and have become much more active since 2013 or so. If anyone has concerns, questions, etc. I'll be happy to address them. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 14:49, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Support

 * 1)  -Xbony2 (talk) 15:10, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
 * 2)  We did have a serious clash a while ago, but since then we have been able to co-operate. So I'm prepared to give Justin a chance, he would probably be a better admin than I ever would (I have no ambitions). DonnanZ (talk) 16:57, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
 * , you had me at "ping" :-) --Robbie SWE (talk) 19:46, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
 * 1)  I know this user to be extremely nice and happy and positive. Also, Koavf is a very trustworthy editor both here and on other projects, and has been here a long time. He really knows his way around and knows what he's doing, and clearly enjoys to do what he does. PseudoSkull (talk) 18:22, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
 * 2)  I have encountered Koavf across several Wikimedia projects and though we have had disagreements, his manner is polite and respectful. Green Giant (talk) 23:54, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
 * 3)  --Tom 144 (𒄩𒇻𒅗𒀸) 00:52, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
 * 4)  I had oppositions to Koavf being a bureaucrat, but I think he'd be a great admin. —AryamanA (मुझसे बात करें • योगदान) 15:26, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
 * 5)  – Jberkel 15:49, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
 * 6)  Equinox ◑ 22:23, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
 * 7)  --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 00:30, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * 8)  =  TheDaveRoss  13:05, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * 9)  — Vorziblix (talk · contribs) 21:04, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * 10)  —Mahāgaja (formerly Angr) · talk 09:21, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
 * 11)  — Ungoliant (falai) 01:06, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
 * 12)  ←₰-→  Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  13:39, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Decision
Passes 15–0. Could a bureaucrat amend my user rights, please? Thanks to whomever does and everyone for the vote of confidence. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:46, 4 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Done. Add your name to WT:Admins, please. —Stephen (Talk) 00:27, 5 February 2018 (UTC)