Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2018-03/User:PseudoSkull for admin

User:PseudoSkull for admin
Nomination: I hereby nominate as a local English Wiktionary Administrator.

Ol' Skullface has been around a long time (under some other names before this; but no stalking because we were all newbies once) and is clearly dedicated to this project, having created a lot of good entries and contributed to RFV/D discussions. He set up the Discord chat server and regularly reverts vandalism, which would be easier if he had the tools.

Schedule:
 * Vote starts: 04:45, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Vote ends: 23:59, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Vote created: Equinox ◑ 04:45, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Acceptance:
 * Languages: en, da-2, es-2, fr-1, pt-1, ca-1
 * Timezone: UTC-5:00
 * I accept this nomination. PseudoSkull (talk) 05:05, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Support

 * 1)  Equinox ◑ 05:14, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * 2)  Conscientious, effective, and would make good use of the admin tools. -Stelio (talk) 10:19, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * 3)  — Ungoliant (falai) 11:28, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * , though I wish she flirted a bit less with (what appears to me as) fringe content. --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 12:40, 16 March 2018 (UTC) P.S. I thought she was already an admin, otherwise I'd've called my buddy Rerum scriptor to nominate her.
 * Fortunately we can rely on Equinox's judgment instead. DonnanZ (talk) 18:46, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
 * In my view fringe content is what sets WT apart from other dictionaries, so I fully endorse it.__Gamren (talk) 09:54, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
 * 1)  — Vorziblix (talk · contribs) 16:42, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * 2)  —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 17:20, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * , has the makings of an awesome admininstrator. --Robbie SWE (talk) 19:29, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * 1)  — (((Romanophile))) ♞ (contributions) 20:36, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * 2)  -Xbony2 (talk) 00:58, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
 * 3)  — justin(r)leung { (t...) 02:56, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
 * 4)  on the condition that the editor will lose admin flag if, in future, someone creates a vote for the editor to keep the admin flag and the vote does not achieve consensus; oppose to the extent the condition is not met. This is nothing personal; it is as a matter of general useful principle. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:35, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I hate to start this debate again, but unless this stipulation is approved by a majority of the voters, Dan's vote must be counted as oppose. —*i̯óh₁n̥C[5] 12:56, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
 * If you wish to discuss this, I have created Wiktionary talk:Votes/sy-2018-03/User:PseudoSkull for admin. --Dan Polansky (talk) 16:34, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
 * 1)  --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 09:03, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
 * 2)  —AryamanA (मुझसे बात करें • योगदान) 11:14, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
 * 3)  —*i̯óh₁n̥C[5] 12:56, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
 * 4)  --SanctMinimalicen (talk) 02:49, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
 * 5)  - DonnanZ (talk) 18:46, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
 * 6)  Wyang (talk) 07:08, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
 * 7)  ←₰-→  Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  10:40, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Abstain

 * --Otra cuenta105 (talk) 16:15, 17 March 2018 (UTC) This user is not allowed to vote

Decision

 * Passes 18–0–0 ($$100%$$–$$0%$$–$$0%$$) or 17–1–0 ($$94.\overline{4}%$$–$$5.\overline{5}%$$–$$0%$$). Could a bureaucrat please update PseudoSkull's user rights? —*i̯óh₁n̥C[5] 00:11, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Edit-summary pinging bureaucrats due to Votes/Active template issue and a great amount of excitement. PseudoSkull (talk) 00:41, 31 March 2018 (UTC)