Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2021-12/User:Fytcha for admin

User:Fytcha for admin
Nomination: I hereby nominate as a local English Wiktionary Administrator.


 * Following up User_talk:Fytcha (where a previous vote seems to have been zapped as "too soon", despite apparent good faith): Fytcha has only become very active in the past few months, but has been around for several years making only good edits, as far as I can see.
 * He/she is very active in dealing with spam and vandalism, although of course so far this has meant constantly posting WT:VIP alerts (look at the recent history of that page!) and doing manual reverts &mdash; not terribly efficient. I think we would do ourselves a favour by giving Fytcha the block button.

Schedule:
 * Vote starts: 03:17, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Vote ends: 23:59, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Vote created: Equinox ◑ 03:17, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Acceptance:
 * Languages: gsw, de, ro, en-4, fr-2, tr-1
 * Timezone: UTC+1/+2 (CET)
 * I accept. Fytcha (talk) 03:22, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Support

 * 1)  as nominator. Equinox ◑ 03:17, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
 * 2)  Akletos (talk) 13:20, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
 * 3) . They're doing a good job, and are pretty active, and I think would make good use of admin tools. —Svārtava [t•c•u•r] 13:24, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
 * 4) . They're just a great user: great in reverting vandalism, prolific contributor, friendly, and articulate. It's a shame the first adminship vote was put up too early, but I have to support this second time around. Imetsia (talk) 17:36, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
 * 5) . They’ve made quite a few contributions to https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Wiktionary:Requests_for_deletion and elsewhere. Overlordnat1 (talk) 19:51, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
 * 6)  --Vahag (talk) 20:19, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
 * 7)  PseudoSkull (talk) 18:10, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
 * 8)  Vininn126 (talk) 18:12, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
 * 9)  Fay Freak (talk) 18:18, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , no doubt in my mind. Looking forward to welcoming you to the admin club ;-) --Robbie SWE (talk) 18:37, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , no concerns. bd2412 T 20:52, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
 * 1)  Allahverdi Verdizade (talk) 21:49, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
 * 2)  – Jberkel 17:48, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
 * 3)  — justin(r)leung { (t...) 02:07, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
 * 4)  PUC – 13:25, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
 * 5)  John Cross (talk) 10:44, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Abstain

 * : I have seen this user in action, but not enough to form an opinion. DonnanZ (talk) 15:09, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
 * 1)  --Numberguy6 (talk) 21:08, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * 2)  I think the vote is a little premature: As far as I can see, this user hasn't interacted much with other editors yet, which would probably be a good idea in case they need to consult a more experienced user in the future. However, I can see that Fytcha would make good use of admin tools, so I won't oppose their adminship. Thadh (talk) 11:12, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I am not allowed to vote, but would also support this guy Br00pVain (talk) 10:46, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Decision

 * Passed unanimously: 16-0-3. Pinging bureaucrats: . Imetsia (talk) 01:03, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅ Chuck Entz (talk) 06:37, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Thanks also to everybody who voted for me. Fytcha (talk) 13:53, 2 January 2022 (UTC)