Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2021-12/User:Vininn126 for admin

User:Vininn126 for admin
Nomination: I hereby nominate as a local English Wiktionary Administrator.

Schedule:
 * Vote starts: 16:00, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Vote ends: 16:00, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Acceptance: Vininn126 (talk) 16:07, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Languages: en, pl-3, ru-2
 * Timezone: UTC+01:00

Support

 * 1)  as nominator. —Svārtava [t•c•u•r] 16:00, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
 * 2) . Good to see more editors becoming sysops.  ·~   dictátor · mundꟾ  17:02, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
 * 3) . Great editor who could stand to benefit from using the admin tools. Imetsia (talk) 17:33, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
 * 4)  PseudoSkull (talk) 18:11, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , it is definitely useful to expand the language competencies to our admin pool. bd2412 T 20:53, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
 * 1)  "XY doesn't need the tools" is not a valid argument against a nominee. Allahverdi Verdizade (talk) 21:30, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
 * 2) . Adminship isn't primarily about whether someone truly needs the tools, it is about whether someone can be trusted with the tools. ←₰-→  Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  12:22, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
 * 3)  Judging by the page Administrators, a diligent Polish-language editor who patrols Polish-related changes would be really useful to have. --Fytcha (talk) 12:48, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
 * 4)  This user seems to ‘know his cebule’! Overlordnat1 (talk) 10:45, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
 * 5)  RcAlex36 (talk) 14:38, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * 6)  ᛙᛆᚱᛐᛁᚿᛌᛆᛌ ᛭ Wiktionary's most active Proto-Norse editor ᛭ Ask me anything 21:20, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * 7) . AG202 (talk) 03:34, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
 * 8)  — justin(r)leung { (t...) 02:17, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
 * 9)  PUC – 13:25, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
 * 10) . Vininn does a good job, keeps entries in check, and Wiktionary could use another Polish-speaking admin as said above. Hythonia (talk) 21:12, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
 * 11)  Mazab IZW (talk) 16:48, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
 * 12)  John Cross (talk) 10:47, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1)  Adminship isn't a right given to distinguish good editors - for that we have whitelist. It's a set of tools that can be given to someone who would make good use of it, most notably to support order on this project. I agree that Vininn is a great editor, even more than great, but I haven't seen them reverting edits, closing RFVs and RFDs, resolving conflicts... I don't think they need admin tools for what they're doing, and you certainly don't need admin tools in order to be a good editor. Thadh (talk) 17:13, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I usually keep a close eye on the Polish recent changes, as that was my main area of focus, and tried to revert something when I saw it. As an admin, I would definitely keep an eye on more than that. I also haven't been in many RF's, as I wasn't sure it was my place, but upon recently hearing that there are a lot that need attention, I'd be willing to contribute what I can to resolving those. Vininn126 (talk) 17:35, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Abstain

 * 1)  A great editor apparently, but I little see him interacting with people, tackling content disputes; I don’t like to vote for an unknown quantity, but it should be predictable what he would use the admin tools for, other than for being diverted from being a good editor, though he probably would have use for the deletion tool. Fay Freak (talk) 21:31, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
 * : I have absolutely no idea what this user is like. DonnanZ (talk) 15:04, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
 * 1)  --Numberguy6 (talk) 21:08, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * 2)  agree w/ User:Fay Freak, after the recent drama(s) we need admins who can help resolve conflicts. – Jberkel 11:32, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Decision

 * Passed. Bureaucrat needed. Pinging —Svārtava [t•c•u•r] 16:00, 2 January 2022 (UTC)