Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2022-04/User:PUC for admin

User:PUC for admin
Nomination: I hereby nominate as a local English Wiktionary Administrator.

Schedule:
 * Vote starts: 10:06, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Vote ends: 23:59, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Vote created: —Svārtava (t/u) • 10:06, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Acceptance: I accept. I regularly revert vandalism, move misspelled pages, tag pages with, so the admin tools would come in handy.

I know I’ve done many weird and/or reprehensible things, but I believe I can honestly say this is all in the past now. For those who aren’t acquainted with the situation, here are the pages for my previous nominations, where everything is laid bare: 1, 2. I invite you to read them before voting. Those two links will be of relevance too.
 * Languages: fr, en-3, ru-2, nl-2
 * Timezone: UTC+2
 * PUC – 13:43, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Support

 * , with the hope that this vote is a success. ·~   dictátor · mundꟾ  13:19, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
 * 1)  as nominator, following the nominee's acceptance; I also strongly think that the abovementioned incident(s) like the sockpuppet-nomination, trivial alt accounts, a few partly objectionable usernames, etc. are too old and irrelevant to even be mentioned, let alone being grounds for opposition. —Svārtava  (t/u) • 13:54, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
 * 2)  —  [ זכריה קהת ] Zack. — 14:47, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
 * , very support &#8209;&#8209;Sarri.greek &#9835; I 15:50, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
 * 1)  Roger.M.Williams (talk) 16:08, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
 * 2)  strongly. I've nominated them before, after all! Imetsia (talk) 17:26, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
 * 3)  Fay Freak (talk) 01:45, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
 * 4)  Kutchkutch (talk) 02:04, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
 * , always. --Robbie SWE (talk) 07:23, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
 * 1)  The tools seem like they'd come in handy, I've only had positive interactions with this user, and they really seem to have grown over time. Vininn126 (talk) 09:40, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
 * 2)  I heard all the best users need 3 admin votes. Equinox ◑ 12:30, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
 * L. O. L. —Svārtava (t/u) • 14:19, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
 * 1)  — Fenakhay ( حيطي · مساهماتي ) 20:36, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
 * 2)  --Vahag (talk) 09:36, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
 * 3)  - the level of transparency here is commendable. John Cross (talk) 16:44, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
 * 4)  PUC has reverted me without giving any reason sometimes (I personally think that such reverts should only be used for obvious vandalism), but they seem to have done it in good faith and their work is commendable. I also appreciate that they are transparent about what they have done in the past. They would make excellent use of the tools. Prahlad balaji (talk) 04:55, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
 * , apologies for the late vote :) Thadh (talk) 21:17, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) . DonnanZ (talk) 17:21, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Why? By the way, I also want to see you as an admin. ·~   dictátor · mundꟾ  17:46, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
 * No, no more nominations for me please. I have been through this 1½ times before, pulling out the 2nd time. There is a certain senior editor, Metaknowledge, who violently opposes me. DonnanZ (talk) 17:56, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
 * You didn’t answer the first part. ·~   dictátor · mundꟾ  18:02, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
 * 1)  (Keep up the good work etc., however) Allahverdi Verdizade (talk) 11:39, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
 * And what’s your reasoning for opposing? ·~   dictátor · mundꟾ  14:13, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
 * 1)  Way too many https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/User:PUC/Socks sock accounts, 7 of which have inappropiate usernames. Updated he has used a sockpuppet to ask his old main account to boost his support for his administrator rights!ADDSamuels (talk) 19:09, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Forgive me for asking but why does he even do that in the first place? --98.179.127.59 01:17, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that's pretty bizarre. Reminds me of Wonderfool. (Although I'm not saying it's sufficient reason to think granting them admin rights would be negative, especially given how long ago it was.) 70.172.194.25 02:51, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Fair see the update, though he has given it, and I guess it's a question on how lenient one must be on forgiving. ADDSamuels (talk) 10:44, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Abstain

 * 1)  Despite the amount of time that has passed since the transgressions discussed in the links above, they still rest heavy on my mind. For that reason I cannot bring myself to support the nomination. I admit that I do not have much, if any, interactions with PUC and so therefore cannot easily judge how good of an editor they are today (though the testimonials are positive!) and so don't see myself as in a position to oppose the nomination. &mdash;The Editor's Apprentice (talk) 20:37, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
 * 2)  for the same reasons as above. AG202 (talk) 14:07, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Decision

 * Passes, Congratulations! —Svārtava (t/u) • 01:07, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅ Chuck Entz (talk) 04:55, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your trust, I'll do my best not to disappoint! PUC – 17:33, 5 May 2022 (UTC)