Wiktionary talk:Feedback/April

Deletion debate
The title of Feedback/April would be more accurate and informative if the year "2008" were stated. Anyway, a different archiving scheme is explained at Processed feedback ("word specific comments go to talk pages where possible, incomprehensible stuff can be deleted, otherwise try and preserve wording when copying across"). --Daniel. 03:16, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I suggested that if all the content were moved to the individual talk pages, these could be deleted very quietly anyway. So delete but it's not gonna happen overnight, and we have too many other things that need doing around here to worry too much about how archives are formatted. Mglovesfun (talk) 23:59, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I would not generally place a value on specific tasks in comparison to others. Some people may want the archiving system to be fixed as soon as possible. I, for instance, can't see the bottom of WT:Feedback (thus, I can't see new messages there) unless I compare revisions, due to the enormous amount of text which doesn't load completely on my PC. Perhaps I'll archive the feedback page after this RFDO discussion is settled. --Daniel. 13:32, 2 February 2010 (UTC)


 * I started to archive things from feedback (back in 2008), but there's very little signal to noise. Just delete it, specific comments that want preserving can be put somewhere at the discretion of whoever. Conrad.Irwin 13:36, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Deleted both. Mglovesfun (talk) 22:43, 16 February 2010 (UTC)