Wiktionary talk:Frequency lists/Korean 200

What is the source for this frequency list? All of the other frequency lists have at least a semblance of reliability. 68.49.113.16 00:48, 27 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Not a clue, but it seems to have been derived from some sort of automated wordlist generator run over a fairly small corpus of conversational Korean. If you're looking for something with more of a semblance of reliability, please try Basic Korean Vocabulary List. -- Visviva 02:39, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

RFDO discussion: January 2015
For such a small list, the appendix has too many non-lemma forms, some would not pass CFI, e.g. word + particle (다음에). Is it worth keeping? I'm not eager to fix it. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 22:01, 20 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Deleted. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 21:17, 28 January 2015 (UTC)