Wiktionary talk:Point of view pushing

I noticed that few administrators are involved in this page and it has even requests from 2007, so it is rarely used (or rather, rarely notified). May I move the page to Vandalism in progress/Point of view pushing, so that it attracts the attention more easily? The rationale for this proposal is that Vandalism in progress lists it as a subpage. The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 18:30, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I, for one, wouldn't mind such a move, I suppose, but don't see the point: how will it be more visible there than it is here? Perhaps we just need to remind interested parties (in the BP perhaps) that this page exists, and advise them to watchlist it. &#x200b;—  msh210  ℠  18:46, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, it would be nice. Does somebody consider an archive for those settled disputes needful? The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 19:23, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Wiktionary:Point of view pushing
We use WT:VIP for this purpose nowadays. No point in keeping this as an inactive page or archive, per w:WP:DENY. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 21:22, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not per DENY, but because it’s better to centralise vandalism reports, instead of having a different page for this or that type of vandalism. — Ungoliant (Falai) 22:15, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. And perhaps, afterward, recreate as redirect. Though I'm not sure if WT:VIP  or  WT:NPOV  would be the better redirect target. —Ruakh TALK 05:37, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Mglovesfun (talk) 21:21, 12 February 2013 (UTC)


 * RFD-failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:07, 1 August 2013 (UTC)