Wiktionary talk:Todo/English non-lemmas with translations

False positives
I've identified a few types of false positives (English terms that probably deserve to have translations, despite not being in Category:English lemmas) that show up here: There are also contractions like, which I'm not sure how to handle. - excarnateSojourner (talk | contrib) 06:28, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Terms like  that have headword lines as if they are exlusively plural nouns (causing them to be categorized as non-lemmas), when in fact they have other uses.
 * 2) Languages like  that use, which incorrectly categorizes them as non-lemmas. Update (November 2022): I have changed all of these to use.
 * 3) Terms like  that have "Translations" sections but only use . This is just because my program looked for a "Translations" heading without caring what was under it. I've changed it to look in English sections for , so this should not be a problem if I re-run it later.