Wiktionary talk:Votes/2014-08/Templates context and label

Is this for real?
Polansky, you are approaching self-parody. — Keφr 17:47, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
 * So tell us, sir, to which template should we convert Wiktionary to? Do you already know it? --Dan Polansky (talk) 17:58, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Implicit label supporters
I have detected the following implicit supporters of the use of : --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:43, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Aɴɢʀ: - 23 August 2014
 * Cloudcuckoolander: taxocrat - 22 October 2014‎
 * Embryomystic: - 5 October 2014
 * ‎Hekaheka: fenomenologisesti‎ - 28 October 2014‎
 * Kephir: wojak - 25 October 2014‎
 * ReidAA: - 5 October 2014
 * Tweenk: partacz - 10 January 2015
 * Updated. --Dan Polansky (talk) 07:46, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Updated. --Dan Polansky (talk) 12:18, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Updated. --Dan Polansky (talk) 23:15, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Updated. --Dan Polansky (talk) 13:04, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Implicit lb supporters
I have detected the following implicit supporters of the use of :

--Dan Polansky (talk) 07:46, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Aɴɢʀ: - 17 October 2014
 * Chuck Entz: jacopever - 11 January 2015
 * I'm so meta even this acronym: rosewooden - 30 November 2014‎
 * JohnC5: Mugel - 11 January 2015‎
 * Keith the Koala: hither and yon - 12 January 2015
 * -sche: - 7 October 2014
 * Saltmarsh: ροή - 5 December 2014‎
 * Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV: genótipo - 9 January 2015‎
 * Vahagn Petrosyan: - 16 January 2015
 * Updated. --Dan Polansky (talk) 20:20, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Updated. --Dan Polansky (talk) 13:11, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Updated. --Dan Polansky (talk) 18:31, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Updated. --Dan Polansky (talk) 11:28, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Implicit cx supporters
I have detected the following implicit supporters of the use of : --Dan Polansky (talk) 07:50, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
 * ‎Atitarev: - 27 October 2014
 * Equinox: plutey - 24 October 2014‎
 * Matthias Buchmeier: Macker - 11 January 2015
 * Romanophile: YouPube - 8 November 2014
 * Type56op9: - 17 November 2014
 * Widsith: : ‎knick off - 29 October 2014‎
 * Wyang: bể - 11 January 2015‎
 * Updated. --Dan Polansky (talk) 23:13, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Updated. --Dan Polansky (talk) 12:50, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Implicit context supporters
I have detected the following implicit supporters of the use of : --Dan Polansky (talk) 12:53, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
 * ‎AdamBMorgan: ‎secondary world - 10 January 2015
 * LlywelynII: chih - 11 January 2015‎
 * Mr. Granger: jerkitude - 22 December 2014‎
 * Nibiko: 細石器 - 8 January 2015
 * ‎SemperBlotto: enurement - 10 January 2015
 * Updated. --Dan Polansky (talk) 13:13, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

The above statistics are not completely relevant to the vote
I use, but I use it because it's both a shortcut and because of the parameter order. If had the same parameter order, I'd use that too. So just the use of a particular doesn't imply that someone prefers that name. —CodeCat 00:41, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The actual editing behavior in the mainspace is merely an ersatz, but it is better than nothing in the absence of explicit disclosure of editor preferences. If e.g. editors use "cx" rather than "lb", it may be because they prefer "context" over "label", or because they prefer "lang=en" over "en", or because they are unaware of "lb". Ideally, editors should disclose their preferences explicitly. They may do so in the poll, but they may also do so on this talk page. --Dan Polansky (talk) 00:52, 29 November 2014 (UTC)