Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2011-02/Disallowing translations for English inflected forms

Checking
Can someone please check this entirely, as it is hard to proof read your own work. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:37, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
 * In the examples, you should probably mention plurals too. Unless I missed it. < class="latinx" >Ƿidsiþ 12:18, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Alternative spellings should not have translations
mentioned this. Obviously that would be a separate vote, but not needed IMO. That's what is for. Seems perfectly reasonable to want to have all the translations in a single translation table, rather than split randomly over several. Mglovesfun (talk) 13:56, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Go ahead, then, merge the translations at behaviour and behavior. See what happens. --Vahag 14:09, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
 * That's to some extent a separate issue - which is an alternative spelling of which? When it comes to entries using I don't think there's an issue - but when neither spelling is considered secondary, the issue you bring up is there. Mglovesfun (talk) 14:24, 8 March 2011 (UTC)