Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2015-12/Definitions

Issues
This seems to condone or require the use of as a context label, when instead we'd like to promote  so that the language code cannot be omitted. Additionally, the bit about italicisation is extremely misleading, considering that we actually use a template,, to do that, and I think it should be removed. , since you're the only person who has voted, I reckon you can change these things if you wish. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 03:54, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I un-started the vote.
 * It's true, what you said about italicization. I rewrote that part, what do you think? The text still mentions what is bold and what is italic because that was decided by vote, but now it's clear that it's the job of the template to format the text that way.
 * I scheduled the vote to start on January 18. Votes/2015-11/term → m; context → label; usex → ux ends on January 16, so we'll have an official position on versus  (not to forget, which is my personal markup choice, and also other editors'). I'll edit the current vote after the other ends.
 * --Daniel Carrero (talk) 08:25, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I think that's a good idea. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 08:28, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Diff
Reminder to myself:

Update the diff before (re-)starting the vote. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 09:34, 11 January 2016 (UTC)