Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2016-02/CFI: List of terms

Postponing this vote
Can we postpone this vote. There is nothing immediately wrong with the section in question and there are too many complaints about there being too many votes. We need to prioritize which votes are more important and which are less important. This one is less important. --WikiTiki89 21:04, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
 * --WikiTiki89 01:35, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Fine with me.
 * As proposed by in Beer parlour/2016/February, I'd also be fine with withdrawing the votes that are clearly going to fail, but only 1 does seem to fit:
 * Votes/pl-2016-01/Pronunciation
 * Other votes either look like they may pass or have no consensus at the moment. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 02:32, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Please don't withdraw ongoing votes, even if they look like they are going to fail. --WikiTiki89 14:08, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Actually, I wasn't paying attention to which vote you were talking about. I would support withdrawing the pronunciation vote, because it should not have been started in the first place. --WikiTiki89 14:16, 19 February 2016 (UTC)


 * What should be the new start date for Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2016-02/CFI: List of terms? --Daniel Carrero (talk) 13:49, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Just strike out the start and end dates and remove it from the active votes list. --WikiTiki89 14:08, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Sentences to stay
This has to stay: "A term need not be limited to a single word in the usual sense. Any of these are also acceptable". The entry defines what is meant by "term" in "[...] This in turn leads to the somewhat more formal guideline of including a term if it is attested and idiomatic." --Dan Polansky (talk) 11:57, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm going to start this vote, since the logo vote ended. I kept the text "A term need not be limited to a single word in the usual sense. Any of these are also acceptable" per what you said. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 00:50, 28 June 2016 (UTC)