Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2016-02/Removing "Flexibility"

Purpose
Is the purpose of this best spun as "to legitimize the de facto unvoted-on imposition of inflexibility by the design and implementation of templates"? DCDuring TALK 16:02, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
 * My opinion is: For undecided and undiscussed matters, we can basically do whatever we want. For example, if we begin working on a language for which we did not create any entries yet or creating new templates we could do whatever we wanted.
 * But if we place something on EL or CFI, especially by vote, that should be able to be discussed, but inflexible otherwise. That's why we have votes, isn't it? --Daniel Carrero (talk) 23:17, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Therefore, I do think EL and CFI should be inflexible on the terms above, some of those are unvoted and that annoys me to some extent, but for the voted-on rules I'm okay with considering them inflexible. (unless otherwise discussed and revisited) I'm saying this because you mentioned "de facto unvoted-on". --Daniel Carrero (talk) 23:25, 13 February 2016 (UTC)