Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2017-04/Well documented languages and constructed languages

Rationale
Some time ago, I did not notice Esperato was a Well Documented Language because it was not on the list; I was probably too tired. Recently, someone at WT:RFV also did not notice. A bit of added explicitness should help this.

A disadvantage of this is that it duplicates information and creates a potential maintenance overhead. To limit that downside, I end the item with "and any other constructed language indicated as approved at Wiktionary:Criteria for inclusion#Constructed languages" so a potential incompleteness arising later does not harm. --Dan Polansky (talk) 10:44, 30 April 2017 (UTC)